Annangrove vs Gables, NSW Suburb Comparison

Annangrove for retirees and investment; Gables for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AnnangroveGables

Overall score

Annangrove

52.4/100

Gables

51.6/100

Crime rate

Annangrove

16.9 / 1k

Gables

39.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Annangrove

19

Gables

91

Population

Annangrove

1,472

Gables

3,339

Metric leadAnnangrove 5Gables 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAnnangroveGables
Overall score52.4/10051.6/100
Housing (desirability)39.4/10040.0/100
Crime rate16.9 / 1k39.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops8576
Walkability32.0/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities1991
Planning activity12118
Green cover9.0%2.0%
Population1,4723,339
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Annangrove reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Gables is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Annangrove sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Gables is in a middle-ring position.

Annangrove pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Gables is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gables, while Annangrove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons