Overall score
Gables
51.6/100
Maraylya
45.5/100
Gables vs Maraylya, NSW Suburb Comparison
Gables for families and schools; Maraylya for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GablesMaraylya
Crime rate
Gables
39.8 / 1k
Maraylya
40.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gables
91
Maraylya
24
Population
Gables
3,339
Maraylya
1,281
Metric leadGables 9Maraylya 22 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gables | Maraylya |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.6/100 | 45.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.0/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.8 / 1k | 40.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 76 | 52 |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 91 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 118 | 6 |
| Green cover | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 3,339 | 1,281 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Gables reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Maraylya is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Gables sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Maraylya is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Gables is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Maraylya answers with a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gables, while Maraylya remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.