Appin vs Camden Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Appin for investment and value; Camden Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AppinCamden Park

Overall score

Appin

38.1/100

Camden Park

48.0/100

Crime rate

Appin

123.5 / 1k

Camden Park

22.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Appin

23

Camden Park

1

Population

Appin

3,213

Camden Park

2,233

Metric leadAppin 5Camden Park 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAppinCamden Park
Overall score38.1/10048.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/1007.2/100
Crime rate123.5 / 1k22.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops319
Walkability30.0/10013.5/100
Nearby amenities231
Planning activity484
Green cover9.7%12.6%
Population3,2132,233
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Appin is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, and Camden Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Appin sits among greener hillside streets, while Camden Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Appin tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Camden Park stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Appin suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Camden Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons