Overall score
Camden Park
48.0/100
Cawdor
37.9/100
Camden Park for retirees and families; Cawdor for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Camden Park
48.0/100
Cawdor
37.9/100
Crime rate
Camden Park
22.2 / 1k
Cawdor
21.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camden Park
1
Cawdor
2
Population
Camden Park
2,233
Cawdor
430
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camden Park | Cawdor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 37.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.2/100 | 42.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.2 / 1k | 21.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 47 |
| Walkability | 13.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 2 |
| Green cover | 12.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 2,233 | 430 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Camden Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Cawdor is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Camden Park pulls ahead on a larger local community, whereas Cawdor is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
Families may find Camden Park the better fit, while retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cawdor.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.