Arncliffe vs Bardwell Park, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Arncliffe | Bardwell Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.1/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.4/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.8 / 1k | 28.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 67 | 41 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 219 | 50 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 3 |
| Population | 12,023 | 2,320 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBardwell Park
- Best for investmentBardwell Park
- Best for best schoolsArncliffe
Comparison summary
Arncliffe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Bardwell Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Arncliffe sits closer to the city centre, whereas Bardwell Park is in a middle-ring position.
Arncliffe pulls ahead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, whereas Bardwell Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Households prioritising schools may find Arncliffe the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Bardwell Park.