Arncliffe vs Bardwell Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bardwell Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArncliffeBardwell Park

Overall score

Arncliffe

55.7/100

Bardwell Park

65.2/100

Crime rate

Arncliffe

55.7 / 1k

Bardwell Park

26.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arncliffe

228

Bardwell Park

56

Population

Arncliffe

12,023

Bardwell Park

2,320

Metric leadArncliffe 6Bardwell Park 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArncliffeBardwell Park
Overall score55.7/10065.2/100
Housing (desirability)31.0/10045.6/100
Crime rate55.7 / 1k26.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1312
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves93
Public transport stops6741
Walkability100.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities22856
Planning activity354
Green cover6.2%14.9%
Population12,0232,320
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Arncliffe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Bardwell Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Arncliffe sits closer to the city centre, whereas Bardwell Park is in a middle-ring position.

Arncliffe pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Bardwell Park is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bardwell Park, while Arncliffe remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons