Arncliffe vs Mascot, NSW Suburb Comparison

Arncliffe for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArncliffeMascot

Overall score

Arncliffe

55.7/100

Mascot

46.4/100

Crime rate

Arncliffe

55.7 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arncliffe

228

Mascot

465

Population

Arncliffe

12,023

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadArncliffe 6Mascot 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArncliffeMascot
Overall score55.7/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)31.0/10043.2/100
Crime rate55.7 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools133
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves922
Public transport stops67136
Walkability100.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities228465
Planning activity3569
Green cover6.2%1.6%
Population12,02321,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Arncliffe reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Arncliffe is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Mascot answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Arncliffe if you are weighing retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mascot for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons