Arncliffe vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Arncliffe | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.1/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.4/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.8 / 1k | 60.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 67 | 136 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 219 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 37 |
| Population | 12,023 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Arncliffe reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Arncliffe is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Mascot answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
Choose Arncliffe if you are weighing families and value-focused buyers; lean toward Mascot for investors.