Overall score
Arncliffe
66.3/100
Mascot
57.8/100
Arncliffe vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison
Arncliffe for retirees and families; Mascot for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ArncliffeMascot
Crime rate
Arncliffe
55.7 / 1k
Mascot
58.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Arncliffe
219
Mascot
420
Population
Arncliffe
12,023
Mascot
21,591
Metric leadArncliffe 6Mascot 5across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Arncliffe | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.3/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.4/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.7 / 1k | 58.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 67 | 136 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 219 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 30 | 51 |
| Population | 12,023 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Arncliffe reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Arncliffe is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Mascot answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
Choose Arncliffe if you are weighing families and value-focused buyers; lean toward Mascot for investors.