Eastgardens vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Eastgardens | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.6/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.4/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 75.6 / 1k | 60.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 136 |
| Walkability | 60.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 37 |
| Population | 4,086 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Eastgardens reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Eastgardens is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Mascot answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Mascot, while Eastgardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.