Eastgardens vs Mascot, NSW Suburb Comparison

Eastgardens for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EastgardensMascot

Overall score

Eastgardens

46.7/100

Mascot

46.4/100

Crime rate

Eastgardens

67.8 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Eastgardens

55

Mascot

465

Population

Eastgardens

4,086

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadEastgardens 5Mascot 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEastgardensMascot
Overall score46.7/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)45.3/10043.2/100
Crime rate67.8 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools133
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—22
Public transport stops18136
Walkability60.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities55465
Planning activity1869
Green cover4.9%1.6%
Population4,08621,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Eastgardens reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Eastgardens is stronger for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook; Mascot answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Choose Eastgardens if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mascot for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons