Eastgardens vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison

Eastgardens for families and schools; Mascot for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EastgardensMascot

Overall score

Eastgardens

44.4/100

Mascot

57.8/100

Crime rate

Eastgardens

67.8 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Eastgardens

54

Mascot

420

Population

Eastgardens

4,086

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadEastgardens 2Mascot 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEastgardensMascot
Overall score44.4/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)7.4/10016.3/100
Crime rate67.8 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools133
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops18136
Walkability60.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities54420
Planning activity1455
Population4,08621,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Eastgardens reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Eastgardens is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Mascot answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Mascot, while Eastgardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons