Hillsdale vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Hillsdale | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.5/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 14.5/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 75.6 / 1k | 60.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 136 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 33 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 37 |
| Population | 5,647 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Hillsdale is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Hillsdale sits among greener hillside streets, while Mascot keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Hillsdale pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mascot is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mascot, while Hillsdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.