Hillsdale vs Mascot, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hillsdale for investment and schools; Mascot for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HillsdaleMascot

Overall score

Hillsdale

44.4/100

Mascot

46.4/100

Crime rate

Hillsdale

67.8 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hillsdale

33

Mascot

465

Population

Hillsdale

5,647

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadHillsdale 4Mascot 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHillsdaleMascot
Overall score44.4/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)52.6/10043.2/100
Crime rate67.8 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools93
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves322
Public transport stops10136
Walkability59.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities33465
Planning activity1169
Green cover6.5%1.6%
Population5,64721,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Hillsdale is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Hillsdale sits among greener hillside streets, while Mascot keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Hillsdale pulls ahead on schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mascot is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Hillsdale suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mascot is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons