Overall score
Hillsdale
44.6/100
Mascot
57.8/100
Hillsdale for families and schools; Mascot for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hillsdale
44.6/100
Mascot
57.8/100
Crime rate
Hillsdale
67.8 / 1k
Mascot
58.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hillsdale
33
Mascot
420
Population
Hillsdale
5,647
Mascot
21,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hillsdale | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.6/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 14.5/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 67.8 / 1k | 58.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 136 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 33 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 55 |
| Population | 5,647 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Hillsdale is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Hillsdale sits among greener hillside streets, while Mascot keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Hillsdale pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mascot is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mascot, while Hillsdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.