Overall score
Daceyville
42.8/100
Mascot
46.4/100
Daceyville vs Mascot, NSW Suburb Comparison
Daceyville for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DaceyvilleMascot
Crime rate
Daceyville
47.6 / 1k
Mascot
58.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Daceyville
47
Mascot
465
Population
Daceyville
1,146
Mascot
21,591
Metric leadDaceyville 5Mascot 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDaceyville
- Best for familiesDaceyville
- Best for investmentDaceyville
- Best for best schoolsDaceyville
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Daceyville | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.8/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.7/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.6 / 1k | 58.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 136 |
| Walkability | 19.5/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 47 | 465 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 69 |
| Green cover | 18.0% | 1.6% |
| Population | 1,146 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Daceyville reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Daceyville tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Mascot stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Daceyville the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mascot.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.