Daceyville vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Daceyville | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.9/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 10.3/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.5 / 1k | 60.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 136 |
| Walkability | 19.5/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 42 | 420 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 37 |
| Population | 1,146 | 21,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMascot
- Best for familiesDaceyville
- Best for investmentMascot
- Best for best valueMascot
- Best for best schoolsDaceyville
Comparison summary
Daceyville reads as a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Daceyville tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Mascot stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves. Daceyville generally means more approachable housing costs, while Mascot leans toward more sought-after housing.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Daceyville the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mascot.