Overall score
Arthurs Seat
29.9/100
Red Hill
48.0/100
Arthurs Seat vs Red Hill, VIC suburb comparison
Arthurs Seat for investment; Red Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Arthurs SeatRed Hill
Crime rate
Arthurs Seat
53.5 / 1k
Red Hill
23.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Arthurs Seat
60
Red Hill
10
Population
Arthurs Seat
414
Red Hill
1,009
Metric leadArthurs Seat 3Red Hill 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesRed Hill
- Best for familiesRed Hill
- Best for investmentArthurs Seat
- Best for best valueRed Hill
- Best for best schoolsRed Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Arthurs Seat | Red Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.9/100 | 48.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 0.5/100 | 11.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.5 / 1k | 23.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 4.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 53 |
| Population | 414 | 1,009 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Arthurs Seat reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Red Hill is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Red Hill sits among greener hillside streets, while Arthurs Seat keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Arthurs Seat tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Red Hill stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.
Arthurs Seat suits investors more clearly, whereas Red Hill is the stronger match for families and value-focused buyers.