Overall score
Arthurs Seat
29.9/100
McCrae
46.7/100
Arthurs Seat vs McCrae, VIC suburb comparison
Arthurs Seat for retirees; McCrae for families and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Arthurs SeatMcCrae
Crime rate
Arthurs Seat
53.5 / 1k
McCrae
64.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Arthurs Seat
60
McCrae
67
Population
Arthurs Seat
414
McCrae
3,311
Metric leadArthurs Seat 3McCrae 6across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesArthurs Seat
- Best for familiesMcCrae
- Best for beach lifestyleMcCrae
- Best for investmentMcCrae
- Best for best valueMcCrae
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Arthurs Seat | McCrae |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.9/100 | 46.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 0.5/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.5 / 1k | 64.4 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 4.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 67 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 94 |
| Population | 414 | 3,311 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Arthurs Seat is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while McCrae is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where McCrae is shaped by the coast, Arthurs Seat offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Arthurs Seat tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while McCrae stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees may find Arthurs Seat the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer McCrae.