Arthurs Seat vs McCrae, VIC Suburb Comparison

Arthurs Seat for retirees and families; McCrae for beach lifestyle and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Arthurs SeatMcCrae

Overall score

Arthurs Seat

58.8/100

McCrae

50.3/100

Crime rate

Arthurs Seat

51.2 / 1k

McCrae

61.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arthurs Seat

65

McCrae

91

Population

Arthurs Seat

414

McCrae

3,311

Metric leadArthurs Seat 5McCrae 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArthurs SeatMcCrae
Overall score58.8/10050.3/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10047.8/100
Crime rate51.2 / 1k61.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops—10
Walkability4.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities6591
Planning activity2594
Green cover7.7%6.6%
Population4143,311
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Arthurs Seat is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while McCrae is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where McCrae is shaped by the coast, Arthurs Seat offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Arthurs Seat tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while McCrae stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Retirees may find Arthurs Seat the better fit, while families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer McCrae.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons