Overall score
Arthurs Seat
58.8/100
McCrae
50.3/100
Arthurs Seat for retirees and families; McCrae for beach lifestyle and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Arthurs Seat
58.8/100
McCrae
50.3/100
Crime rate
Arthurs Seat
51.2 / 1k
McCrae
61.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Arthurs Seat
65
McCrae
91
Population
Arthurs Seat
414
McCrae
3,311
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Arthurs Seat | McCrae |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.8/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 47.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 51.2 / 1k | 61.5 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 4.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 91 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 94 |
| Green cover | 7.7% | 6.6% |
| Population | 414 | 3,311 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Arthurs Seat is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while McCrae is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where McCrae is shaped by the coast, Arthurs Seat offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Arthurs Seat tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while McCrae stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.
Retirees may find Arthurs Seat the better fit, while families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer McCrae.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.