Arthurs Seat vs McCrae, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Arthurs Seat | McCrae |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.8/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 0.5/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.6 / 1k | 67.0 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 4.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 59 | 64 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 94 |
| Population | 414 | 3,311 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesArthurs Seat
- Best for familiesMcCrae
- Best for beach lifestyleMcCrae
- Best for investmentMcCrae
- Best for best valueMcCrae
Comparison summary
Arthurs Seat is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while McCrae is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where McCrae is shaped by the coast, Arthurs Seat offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Arthurs Seat tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while McCrae stands out for housing affordability and walkability.
Retirees may find Arthurs Seat the better fit, while families and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer McCrae.