Arthurs Seat vs Rosebud, VIC suburb comparison

Arthurs Seat for retirees; Rosebud for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Arthurs SeatRosebud

Overall score

Arthurs Seat

29.9/100

Rosebud

48.9/100

Crime rate

Arthurs Seat

53.5 / 1k

Rosebud

140.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arthurs Seat

60

Rosebud

70

Population

Arthurs Seat

414

Rosebud

14,381

Metric leadArthurs Seat 3Rosebud 6across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArthurs SeatRosebud
Overall score29.9/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)0.5/10059.4/100
Crime rate53.5 / 1k140.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves125
Public transport stops30
Walkability4.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities6070
Planning activity25270
Population41414,381
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/103/10

Comparison summary

Arthurs Seat reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Rosebud is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Rosebud is shaped by the coast, Arthurs Seat offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Arthurs Seat is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Rosebud answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. On housing, Arthurs Seat sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Rosebud.

Arthurs Seat suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Rosebud is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors.

Related comparisons