Arumbera vs The Gap, NT suburb comparison

Arumbera for investment; The Gap for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArumberaThe Gap

Overall score

Arumbera

20.1/100

The Gap

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Arumbera

0

The Gap

87

Population

Arumbera

257

The Gap

1,945

Metric leadArumbera 1The Gap 61 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArumberaThe Gap
Overall score20.1/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)72.1/10045.6/100
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops310
Walkability4.5/10019.0/100
Nearby amenities087
Population2571,945
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Arumbera is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and The Gap is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Arumbera pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas The Gap is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Arumbera generally means more approachable housing costs, while The Gap leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Arumbera suits families and investors more clearly, whereas The Gap is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons