Ciccone vs The Gap, NT suburb comparison

Ciccone for families and investment; The Gap for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CicconeThe Gap

Overall score

Ciccone

46.8/100

The Gap

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Ciccone

50

The Gap

87

Population

Ciccone

281

The Gap

1,945

Metric leadCiccone 3The Gap 5across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCicconeThe Gap
Overall score46.8/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10045.6/100
Schools & preschools95
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops410
Walkability10.0/10019.0/100
Nearby amenities5087
Population2811,945
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Ciccone reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; The Gap is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Ciccone pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas The Gap is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Ciccone sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in The Gap.

Families and investors may find Ciccone the better fit, while retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer The Gap.

Related comparisons