Ciccone vs Stuart, NT suburb comparison

Ciccone for investment and value; Stuart for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CicconeStuart

Overall score

Ciccone

46.8/100

Stuart

34.4/100

Nearby amenities

Ciccone

50

Stuart

9

Population

Ciccone

281

Stuart

459

Metric leadCiccone 5Stuart 21 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCicconeStuart
Overall score46.8/10034.4/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10045.0/100
Schools & preschools93
Public transport stops44
Walkability10.0/1008.0/100
Nearby amenities509
Population281459
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Ciccone is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Stuart is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Ciccone pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Stuart is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Ciccone the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Stuart.

Related comparisons