Ciccone vs Larapinta, NT suburb comparison

Ciccone for families and investment; Larapinta for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CicconeLarapinta

Overall score

Ciccone

46.8/100

Larapinta

38.9/100

Nearby amenities

Ciccone

50

Larapinta

7

Population

Ciccone

281

Larapinta

2,368

Metric leadCiccone 4Larapinta 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCicconeLarapinta
Overall score46.8/10038.9/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10052.2/100
Schools & preschools92
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops47
Walkability10.0/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities507
Population2812,368
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Ciccone is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Larapinta is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Ciccone tends to lead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Larapinta stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Ciccone sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Larapinta.

Choose Ciccone if you are weighing families and investors; lean toward Larapinta for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons