Ilparpa vs The Gap, NT suburb comparison

Ilparpa for families and investment; The Gap for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IlparpaThe Gap

Overall score

Ilparpa

34.6/100

The Gap

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Ilparpa

0

The Gap

87

Population

Ilparpa

542

The Gap

1,945

Metric leadIlparpa 2The Gap 5across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIlparpaThe Gap
Overall score34.6/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)59.9/10045.6/100
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops310
Walkability4.5/10019.0/100
Nearby amenities087
Population5421,945
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Ilparpa reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; The Gap is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Ilparpa is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; The Gap answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Ilparpa suits families and investors more clearly, whereas The Gap is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons