Arundel vs Labrador, QLD Suburb Comparison

Arundel for families and value; Labrador for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ArundelLabrador

Overall score

Arundel

46.0/100

Labrador

49.9/100

Crime rate

Arundel

66.6 / 1k

Labrador

142.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Arundel

60

Labrador

372

Population

Arundel

11,171

Labrador

18,643

Metric leadArundel 4Labrador 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryArundelLabrador
Overall score46.0/10049.9/100
Housing (desirability)59.2/10058.8/100
Crime rate66.6 / 1k142.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves1624
Public transport stops3372
Walkability36.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities60372
Green cover13.6%13.0%
Population11,17118,643
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Arundel is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Labrador is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Arundel is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Labrador answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Arundel if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Labrador for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons