Overall score
Ashton
51.5/100
Forest Range
35.7/100
Ashton vs Forest Range, SA suburb comparison
Ashton for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshtonForest Range
Crime rate
Ashton
8.0 / 1k
Forest Range
16.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashton
8
Forest Range
1
Population
Ashton
481
Forest Range
290
Metric leadAshton 7Forest Range 1across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashton | Forest Range |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.5/100 | 35.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.2/100 | 22.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.0 / 1k | 16.3 / 1k |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 6 |
| Population | 481 | 290 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Ashton reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Ashton sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Forest Range is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Ashton tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Forest Range stands out for a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ashton, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.