Basket Range vs Forest Range, SA Suburb Comparison

Basket Range for retirees and families; Forest Range for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Basket RangeForest Range

Overall score

Basket Range

44.6/100

Forest Range

40.8/100

Crime rate

Basket Range

23.8 / 1k

Forest Range

19.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Basket Range

7

Forest Range

2

Population

Basket Range

364

Forest Range

290

Metric leadBasket Range 6Forest Range 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBasket RangeForest Range
Overall score44.6/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)27.4/10037.5/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k19.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Walkability2.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities72
Planning activity97
Green cover36.5%6.1%
Population364290
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Basket Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.

Basket Range tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Forest Range stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Basket Range if you are weighing families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Forest Range for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons