Overall score
Basket Range
42.7/100
Forest Range
36.1/100
Basket Range vs Forest Range, SA suburb comparison
Basket Range for families and investment; Forest Range for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Basket RangeForest Range
Crime rate
Basket Range
23.8 / 1k
Forest Range
19.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Basket Range
8
Forest Range
1
Population
Basket Range
364
Forest Range
290
Metric leadBasket Range 6Forest Range 2across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesForest Range
- Best for familiesBasket Range
- Best for investmentBasket Range
- Best for best valueBasket Range
- Best for best schoolsBasket Range
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Basket Range | Forest Range |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.7/100 | 36.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.9/100 | 22.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 19.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 6 |
| Population | 364 | 290 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Basket Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Basket Range tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Forest Range stands out for a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Basket Range, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.