Overall score
Basket Range
44.6/100
Forest Range
40.8/100
Basket Range for retirees and families; Forest Range for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Basket Range
44.6/100
Forest Range
40.8/100
Crime rate
Basket Range
23.8 / 1k
Forest Range
19.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Basket Range
7
Forest Range
2
Population
Basket Range
364
Forest Range
290
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Basket Range | Forest Range |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.6/100 | 40.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 37.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 19.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 7 |
| Green cover | 36.5% | 6.1% |
| Population | 364 | 290 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Basket Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Basket Range tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Forest Range stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Basket Range if you are weighing families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Forest Range for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.