Overall score
Forest Range
40.8/100
Oakbank
48.9/100
Oakbank for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Range
40.8/100
Oakbank
48.9/100
Crime rate
Forest Range
19.6 / 1k
Oakbank
8.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Range
2
Oakbank
16
Population
Forest Range
290
Oakbank
865
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Range | Oakbank |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.8/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.5/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 19.6 / 1k | 8.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 15.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 16 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 15 |
| Green cover | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 290 | 865 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Forest Range reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Oakbank is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Forest Range pulls ahead on tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook, whereas Oakbank is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Oakbank, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.