Overall score
Forest Range
35.7/100
Oakbank
43.2/100
Oakbank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Range
35.7/100
Oakbank
43.2/100
Crime rate
Forest Range
16.3 / 1k
Oakbank
7.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Range
1
Oakbank
15
Population
Forest Range
290
Oakbank
865
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Range | Oakbank |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.7/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.3/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.3 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 15.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 15 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 13 |
| Population | 290 | 865 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Forest Range reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Oakbank is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Forest Range pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Oakbank is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Oakbank, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.