Forest Range vs Oakbank, SA Suburb Comparison

Oakbank for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Forest RangeOakbank

Overall score

Forest Range

40.8/100

Oakbank

48.9/100

Crime rate

Forest Range

19.6 / 1k

Oakbank

8.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forest Range

2

Oakbank

16

Population

Forest Range

290

Oakbank

865

Metric leadForest Range 2Oakbank 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForest RangeOakbank
Overall score40.8/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)37.5/10051.2/100
Crime rate19.6 / 1k8.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops—10
Walkability0.0/10015.0/100
Nearby amenities216
Planning activity715
Green cover6.1%0.0%
Population290865
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Forest Range reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Oakbank is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.

Forest Range pulls ahead on tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook, whereas Oakbank is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Oakbank, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons