Overall score
Forest Range
35.7/100
Lenswood
43.8/100
Lenswood for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Range
35.7/100
Lenswood
43.8/100
Crime rate
Forest Range
16.3 / 1k
Lenswood
23.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Range
1
Lenswood
3
Population
Forest Range
290
Lenswood
534
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Range | Lenswood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.7/100 | 43.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.3/100 | 59.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.3 / 1k | 23.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 12 |
| Population | 290 | 534 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Lenswood is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
On the data, Forest Range is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Lenswood answers with housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lenswood, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.