Overall score
Forest Range
40.8/100
Lenswood
44.7/100
Forest Range for investment; Lenswood for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Range
40.8/100
Lenswood
44.7/100
Crime rate
Forest Range
19.6 / 1k
Lenswood
17.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Range
2
Lenswood
7
Population
Forest Range
290
Lenswood
534
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Range | Lenswood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.8/100 | 44.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.5/100 | 35.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 19.6 / 1k | 17.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 7 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 14 |
| Green cover | 6.1% | 4.1% |
| Population | 290 | 534 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Lenswood is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
On the data, Forest Range is stronger for tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook; Lenswood answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lenswood, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.