Forest Range vs Lenswood, SA Suburb Comparison

Forest Range for investment; Lenswood for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Forest RangeLenswood

Overall score

Forest Range

40.8/100

Lenswood

44.7/100

Crime rate

Forest Range

19.6 / 1k

Lenswood

17.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forest Range

2

Lenswood

7

Population

Forest Range

290

Lenswood

534

Metric leadForest Range 3Lenswood 43 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForest RangeLenswood
Overall score40.8/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)37.5/10035.1/100
Crime rate19.6 / 1k17.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities27
Planning activity714
Green cover6.1%4.1%
Population290534
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Forest Range is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Lenswood is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

On the data, Forest Range is stronger for tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook; Lenswood answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lenswood, while Forest Range remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons