Overall score
Basket Range
44.6/100
Carey Gully
44.5/100
Basket Range vs Carey Gully, SA Suburb Comparison
Basket Range for families and schools; Carey Gully for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Basket RangeCarey Gully
Crime rate
Basket Range
23.8 / 1k
Carey Gully
13.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Basket Range
7
Carey Gully
15
Population
Basket Range
364
Carey Gully
428
Metric leadBasket Range 2Carey Gully 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesBasket Range
- Best for investmentCarey Gully
- Best for best valueCarey Gully
- Best for best schoolsBasket Range
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Basket Range | Carey Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.6/100 | 44.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 13.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 15 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 22.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 15 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 8 |
| Green cover | 36.5% | 5.9% |
| Population | 364 | 428 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Basket Range reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Carey Gully is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Basket Range pulls ahead on tree cover and green space, plus overall desirability, whereas Carey Gully is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Basket Range the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carey Gully.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.