Overall score
Ashtonfield
45.3/100
Chisholm
51.0/100
Chisholm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ashtonfield
45.3/100
Chisholm
51.0/100
Crime rate
Ashtonfield
106.7 / 1k
Chisholm
77.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashtonfield
64
Chisholm
308
Population
Ashtonfield
4,589
Chisholm
4,577
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashtonfield | Chisholm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.3/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 75.3/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 106.7 / 1k | 77.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 69 | 48 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 308 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 96 |
| Population | 4,589 | 4,577 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Ashtonfield reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Ashtonfield pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas Chisholm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Chisholm, while Ashtonfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.