Overall score
Chisholm
51.0/100
Metford
46.0/100
Chisholm vs Metford, NSW suburb comparison
Chisholm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChisholmMetford
Crime rate
Chisholm
77.2 / 1k
Metford
106.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chisholm
308
Metford
95
Population
Chisholm
4,577
Metford
4,707
Metric leadChisholm 6Metford 5across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chisholm | Metford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 77.2 / 1k | 106.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 64 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 308 | 95 |
| Planning activity | 96 | 7 |
| Population | 4,577 | 4,707 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Chisholm reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Metford is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Chisholm pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Metford is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. Chisholm generally means more sought-after housing, while Metford leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Chisholm, while Metford remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.