Overall score
Chisholm
51.0/100
Thornton
62.1/100
Chisholm vs Thornton, NSW suburb comparison
Chisholm for retirees and families; Thornton for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChisholmThornton
Crime rate
Chisholm
77.2 / 1k
Thornton
77.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chisholm
308
Thornton
167
Population
Chisholm
4,577
Thornton
10,690
Metric leadChisholm 2Thornton 54 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chisholm | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.0/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 77.2 / 1k | 77.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 143 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 308 | 167 |
| Planning activity | 96 | 46 |
| Population | 4,577 | 10,690 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Thornton is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Chisholm pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Thornton is the better pick for public transport access and walkability.
Retirees and families may find Chisholm the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Thornton.