Atwell vs Cockburn Central, WA Suburb Comparison

Atwell for retirees and value; Cockburn Central for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AtwellCockburn Central

Overall score

Atwell

46.8/100

Cockburn Central

56.0/100

Crime rate

Atwell

53.7 / 1k

Cockburn Central

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Atwell

315

Cockburn Central

159

Population

Atwell

9,287

Cockburn Central

1,521

Metric leadAtwell 5Cockburn Central 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAtwellCockburn Central
Overall score46.8/10056.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/10050.4/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves18—
Public transport stops3639
Walkability72.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities315159
Green cover8.6%8.1%
Population9,2871,521
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Atwell is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Cockburn Central is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Atwell tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Cockburn Central stands out for public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Atwell, while Cockburn Central remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons