Beeliar vs Cockburn Central, WA Suburb Comparison

Beeliar for value; Cockburn Central for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeeliarCockburn Central

Overall score

Beeliar

40.4/100

Cockburn Central

56.0/100

Crime rate

Beeliar

53.7 / 1k

Cockburn Central

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beeliar

44

Cockburn Central

159

Population

Beeliar

8,617

Cockburn Central

1,521

Metric leadBeeliar 4Cockburn Central 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeeliarCockburn Central
Overall score40.4/10056.0/100
Housing (desirability)54.8/10050.4/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves13—
Public transport stops4139
Walkability55.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities44159
Green cover2.5%8.1%
Population8,6171,521
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Beeliar reads as a metro established suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Cockburn Central is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beeliar tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and overall desirability, while Cockburn Central stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Beeliar the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cockburn Central.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons