Ayr vs Jarvisfield, QLD suburb comparison

Ayr for families and investment; Jarvisfield for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AyrJarvisfield

Overall score

Ayr

58.2/100

Jarvisfield

20.8/100

Crime rate

Ayr

60.4 / 1k

Jarvisfield

59.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ayr

115

Jarvisfield

0

Population

Ayr

8,603

Jarvisfield

343

Metric leadAyr 6Jarvisfield 2across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesJarvisfield
  • Best for familiesAyr
  • Best for investmentAyr
  • Best for best valueAyr
  • Best for best schoolsAyr

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAyrJarvisfield
Overall score58.2/10020.8/100
Housing (desirability)49.2/10022.3/100
Crime rate60.4 / 1k59.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools71
Parks & reserves17
Walkability71.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1150
Population8,603343
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Ayr is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Jarvisfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Ayr pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Jarvisfield is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Ayr generally means more approachable housing costs, while Jarvisfield leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Ayr suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Jarvisfield is the stronger match for retirees.

Related comparisons