Overall score
Jarvisfield
20.8/100
McDesme
30.5/100
Jarvisfield vs McDesme, QLD suburb comparison
Jarvisfield for retirees and schools; McDesme for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
JarvisfieldMcDesme
Crime rate
Jarvisfield
59.8 / 1k
McDesme
60.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jarvisfield
0
McDesme
0
Population
Jarvisfield
343
McDesme
254
Metric leadJarvisfield 2McDesme 32 tiedacross 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesJarvisfield
- Best for familiesMcDesme
- Best for investmentMcDesme
- Best for best valueMcDesme
- Best for best schoolsJarvisfield
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jarvisfield | McDesme |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 20.8/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.3/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.8 / 1k | 60.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 343 | 254 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Jarvisfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while McDesme is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Jarvisfield pulls ahead on a larger local community, whereas McDesme is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Jarvisfield if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward McDesme for families and investors.