Overall score
Jarvisfield
26.0/100
McDesme
37.7/100
Jarvisfield vs McDesme, QLD Suburb Comparison
McDesme for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
JarvisfieldMcDesme
Crime rate
Jarvisfield
99.0 / 1k
McDesme
96.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jarvisfield
0
McDesme
0
Population
Jarvisfield
343
McDesme
254
Metric leadJarvisfield 2McDesme 43 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jarvisfield | McDesme |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.0/100 | 37.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.3/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 99.0 / 1k | 96.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 8.0/100 | 7.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 343 | 254 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Jarvisfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while McDesme is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Jarvisfield pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, whereas McDesme is the better pick for housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Jarvisfield if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward McDesme for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.