Fredericksfield vs McDesme, QLD Suburb Comparison

Fredericksfield for retirees and families; McDesme for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FredericksfieldMcDesme

Overall score

Fredericksfield

41.6/100

McDesme

37.7/100

Crime rate

Fredericksfield

60.3 / 1k

McDesme

96.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fredericksfield

0

McDesme

0

Population

Fredericksfield

259

McDesme

254

Metric leadFredericksfield 5McDesme 13 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFredericksfieldMcDesme
Overall score41.6/10037.7/100
Housing (desirability)52.7/10052.1/100
Crime rate60.3 / 1k96.6 / 1k
Weather (desirability)8.0/1007.3/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population259254
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fredericksfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and McDesme is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Fredericksfield tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, while McDesme stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Fredericksfield generally means more approachable housing costs, while McDesme leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Fredericksfield, while McDesme remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons