Overall score
Fredericksfield
45.8/100
McDesme
31.1/100
Fredericksfield vs McDesme, QLD suburb comparison
Fredericksfield for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FredericksfieldMcDesme
Crime rate
Fredericksfield
33.8 / 1k
McDesme
57.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fredericksfield
0
McDesme
0
Population
Fredericksfield
259
McDesme
254
Metric leadFredericksfield 4McDesme 12 tiedacross 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFredericksfield
- Best for familiesFredericksfield
- Best for investmentFredericksfield
- Best for best valueFredericksfield
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fredericksfield | McDesme |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.8/100 | 31.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.0/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.8 / 1k | 57.0 / 1k |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 259 | 254 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Fredericksfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and McDesme is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Fredericksfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while McDesme stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Fredericksfield generally means more approachable housing costs, while McDesme leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fredericksfield, while McDesme remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.