Fredericksfield vs Home Hill, QLD Suburb Comparison

Fredericksfield for value and schools; Home Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FredericksfieldHome Hill

Overall score

Fredericksfield

41.6/100

Home Hill

47.8/100

Crime rate

Fredericksfield

60.3 / 1k

Home Hill

62.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fredericksfield

0

Home Hill

184

Population

Fredericksfield

259

Home Hill

2,876

Metric leadFredericksfield 2Home Hill 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFredericksfieldHome Hill
Overall score41.6/10047.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.7/10054.2/100
Crime rate60.3 / 1k62.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—3
Weather (desirability)8.0/1008.0/100
Parks & reserves—8
Walkability0.0/10057.5/100
Nearby amenities0184
Green cover0.0%0.2%
Population2592,876
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/102/10

Comparison summary

Fredericksfield reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Home Hill is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Fredericksfield pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Home Hill is the better pick for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Fredericksfield suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Home Hill is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons