Home Hill vs Jarvisfield, QLD Suburb Comparison

Home Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Home HillJarvisfield

Overall score

Home Hill

47.8/100

Jarvisfield

26.0/100

Crime rate

Home Hill

62.5 / 1k

Jarvisfield

99.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Home Hill

184

Jarvisfield

0

Population

Home Hill

2,876

Jarvisfield

343

Metric leadHome Hill 8Jarvisfield 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHome HillJarvisfield
Overall score47.8/10026.0/100
Housing (desirability)54.2/10045.3/100
Crime rate62.5 / 1k99.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)8.0/1008.0/100
Parks & reserves8—
Walkability57.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1840
Green cover0.2%0.0%
Population2,876343
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Home Hill is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Jarvisfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Home Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Jarvisfield is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Home Hill generally means more approachable housing costs, while Jarvisfield leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Home Hill, while Jarvisfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons