Overall score
Airville
30.0/100
Fredericksfield
41.6/100
Fredericksfield for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Airville
30.0/100
Fredericksfield
41.6/100
Crime rate
Airville
97.3 / 1k
Fredericksfield
60.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Airville
0
Fredericksfield
0
Population
Airville
308
Fredericksfield
259
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Airville | Fredericksfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.0/100 | 41.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 34.5/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 97.3 / 1k | 60.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 7.3/100 | 8.0/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 308 | 259 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Airville is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Fredericksfield is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Airville tends to lead on a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Fredericksfield stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. Airville generally means more mid-market housing value, while Fredericksfield leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Airville suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Fredericksfield is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.