Fredericksfield vs Mount Kelly, QLD suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Fredericksfield | Mount Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.6/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.0/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.7 / 1k | 51.5 / 1k |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 1 |
| Population | 259 | 291 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesFredericksfield
- Best for familiesFredericksfield
- Best for investmentMount Kelly
Comparison summary
Fredericksfield reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Mount Kelly is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Kelly sits among greener hillside streets, while Fredericksfield keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Fredericksfield tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, while Mount Kelly stands out for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Fredericksfield sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Mount Kelly.
Retirees and families may find Fredericksfield the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Mount Kelly.