Overall score
McDesme
30.5/100
Mount Kelly
37.9/100
McDesme vs Mount Kelly, QLD suburb comparison
Mount Kelly for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
McDesmeMount Kelly
Crime rate
McDesme
60.8 / 1k
Mount Kelly
60.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
McDesme
0
Mount Kelly
1
Population
McDesme
254
Mount Kelly
291
Metric leadMcDesme 0Mount Kelly 61 tiedacross 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Kelly
- Best for investmentMount Kelly
- Best for best valueMount Kelly
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | McDesme | Mount Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.5/100 | 37.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.0/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.8 / 1k | 60.2 / 1k |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 1 |
| Population | 254 | 291 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
McDesme is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Mount Kelly is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Kelly sits among greener hillside streets, while McDesme keeps a flatter suburban layout.
McDesme pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, whereas Mount Kelly is the better pick for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Kelly, while McDesme remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.