Overall score
Bacchus Marsh
49.4/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Bacchus Marsh for retirees and families; Long Forest for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bacchus Marsh
49.4/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Crime rate
Bacchus Marsh
145.9 / 1k
Long Forest
34.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bacchus Marsh
278
Long Forest
3
Population
Bacchus Marsh
7,808
Long Forest
343
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bacchus Marsh | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.4/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.0/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 145.9 / 1k | 34.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | — |
| Public transport stops | 32 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 278 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 73 | 4 |
| Green cover | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Population | 7,808 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Bacchus Marsh is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Bacchus Marsh sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Bacchus Marsh tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Long Forest stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Bacchus Marsh generally means more mid-market housing value, while Long Forest leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Bacchus Marsh suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Long Forest is the stronger match for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.