Bacchus Marsh vs Long Forest, VIC suburb comparison

Bacchus Marsh for investment and schools; Long Forest for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bacchus MarshLong Forest

Overall score

Bacchus Marsh

63.1/100

Long Forest

50.1/100

Crime rate

Bacchus Marsh

153.7 / 1k

Long Forest

29.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bacchus Marsh

267

Long Forest

2

Population

Bacchus Marsh

7,808

Long Forest

343

Metric leadBacchus Marsh 4Long Forest 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBacchus MarshLong Forest
Overall score63.1/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)59.3/10091.7/100
Crime rate153.7 / 1k29.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Parks & reserves8
Public transport stops32
Walkability100.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities2672
Planning activity734
Population7,808343
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Bacchus Marsh is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Bacchus Marsh sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.

Bacchus Marsh tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Long Forest stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Bacchus Marsh suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Long Forest is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons