Bacchus Marsh vs Long Forest, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bacchus Marsh | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.1/100 | 49.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.3/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 169.4 / 1k | 32.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | — |
| Public transport stops | 32 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 267 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 73 | 4 |
| Population | 7,808 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesLong Forest
- Best for investmentBacchus Marsh
- Best for best valueLong Forest
- Best for best schoolsBacchus Marsh
Comparison summary
Bacchus Marsh is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Bacchus Marsh sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Bacchus Marsh tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Long Forest stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Bacchus Marsh suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Long Forest is the stronger match for retirees and value-focused buyers.