Coimadai vs Long Forest, VIC Suburb Comparison

Coimadai for families; Long Forest for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoimadaiLong Forest

Overall score

Coimadai

31.7/100

Long Forest

44.0/100

Crime rate

Coimadai

99.8 / 1k

Long Forest

34.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coimadai

1

Long Forest

3

Population

Coimadai

409

Long Forest

343

Metric leadCoimadai 2Long Forest 53 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoimadaiLong Forest
Overall score31.7/10044.0/100
Housing (desirability)42.7/10052.2/100
Crime rate99.8 / 1k34.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1—
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities13
Planning activity144
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population409343
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Coimadai reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Coimadai sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.

On the data, Coimadai is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Long Forest answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Households prioritising schools may find Coimadai the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Long Forest.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons