Overall score
Coimadai
31.6/100
Long Forest
50.1/100
Coimadai vs Long Forest, VIC suburb comparison
Coimadai for schools; Long Forest for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CoimadaiLong Forest
Crime rate
Coimadai
181.8 / 1k
Long Forest
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coimadai
0
Long Forest
2
Population
Coimadai
409
Long Forest
343
Metric leadCoimadai 2Long Forest 51 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLong Forest
- Best for familiesLong Forest
- Best for investmentLong Forest
- Best for best valueLong Forest
- Best for best schoolsCoimadai
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coimadai | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.6/100 | 50.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.6/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 181.8 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 4 |
| Population | 409 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Coimadai reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Coimadai sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.
On the data, Coimadai is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Long Forest answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Households prioritising schools may find Coimadai the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Long Forest.