Overall score
Coimadai
31.7/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Coimadai for families; Long Forest for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coimadai
31.7/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Crime rate
Coimadai
99.8 / 1k
Long Forest
34.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coimadai
1
Long Forest
3
Population
Coimadai
409
Long Forest
343
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coimadai | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.7/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.7/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 99.8 / 1k | 34.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 4 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 409 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Coimadai reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Coimadai sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.
On the data, Coimadai is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Long Forest answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Households prioritising schools may find Coimadai the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Long Forest.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.