Overall score
Darley
38.5/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Darley for retirees and families; Long Forest for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Darley
38.5/100
Long Forest
44.0/100
Crime rate
Darley
56.8 / 1k
Long Forest
34.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Darley
21
Long Forest
3
Population
Darley
9,190
Long Forest
343
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darley | Long Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.5/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.8 / 1k | 34.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | — |
| Public transport stops | 27 | — |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 38 | 4 |
| Green cover | 5.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 9,190 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Darley is a well-connected metro established suburb with a familiar suburban feel, while Long Forest is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Darley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Long Forest is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Darley pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Long Forest is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. On housing, Darley sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Long Forest.
Choose Darley if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Long Forest for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.