Balliang vs Darley, VIC Suburb Comparison

Balliang for retirees and families; Darley for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalliangDarley

Overall score

Balliang

49.3/100

Darley

38.5/100

Crime rate

Balliang

71.2 / 1k

Darley

56.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balliang

3

Darley

21

Population

Balliang

254

Darley

9,190

Metric leadBalliang 4Darley 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalliangDarley
Overall score49.3/10038.5/100
Housing (desirability)28.9/10054.5/100
Crime rate71.2 / 1k56.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops—27
Walkability0.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities321
Planning activity1138
Green cover15.1%5.6%
Population2549,190
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

Balliang reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Darley is a well-connected metro established suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Balliang sits among greener hillside streets, while Darley keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Balliang pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Darley is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Balliang generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Darley leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Darley, while Balliang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons