Bacchus Marsh vs Balliang, VIC Suburb Comparison

Bacchus Marsh for retirees and investment; Balliang for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bacchus MarshBalliang

Overall score

Bacchus Marsh

49.4/100

Balliang

49.3/100

Crime rate

Bacchus Marsh

145.9 / 1k

Balliang

71.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bacchus Marsh

278

Balliang

3

Population

Bacchus Marsh

7,808

Balliang

254

Metric leadBacchus Marsh 6Balliang 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBacchus MarshBalliang
Overall score49.4/10049.3/100
Housing (desirability)53.0/10028.9/100
Crime rate145.9 / 1k71.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops32—
Walkability100.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities2783
Planning activity7311
Green cover8.2%15.1%
Population7,808254
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Bacchus Marsh reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Balliang is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Balliang sits among greener hillside streets, while Bacchus Marsh keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bacchus Marsh tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Balliang stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Bacchus Marsh sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Balliang.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bacchus Marsh, while Balliang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons