Balliang vs Maddingley, VIC Suburb Comparison

Balliang for schools; Maddingley for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BalliangMaddingley

Overall score

Balliang

49.3/100

Maddingley

38.9/100

Crime rate

Balliang

71.2 / 1k

Maddingley

76.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Balliang

3

Maddingley

61

Population

Balliang

254

Maddingley

5,491

Metric leadBalliang 5Maddingley 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBalliangMaddingley
Overall score49.3/10038.9/100
Housing (desirability)28.9/10057.0/100
Crime rate71.2 / 1k76.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops—24
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities361
Planning activity1153
Green cover15.1%7.0%
Population2545,491
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Balliang reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Maddingley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Balliang sits among greener hillside streets, while Maddingley keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Balliang tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Maddingley stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Balliang generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Maddingley leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maddingley, while Balliang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons