Overall score
Balliang
49.3/100
Maddingley
38.9/100
Balliang for schools; Maddingley for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Balliang
49.3/100
Maddingley
38.9/100
Crime rate
Balliang
71.2 / 1k
Maddingley
76.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Balliang
3
Maddingley
61
Population
Balliang
254
Maddingley
5,491
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Balliang | Maddingley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.3/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.9/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 71.2 / 1k | 76.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | — | 24 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 61 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 53 |
| Green cover | 15.1% | 7.0% |
| Population | 254 | 5,491 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Balliang reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Maddingley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Balliang sits among greener hillside streets, while Maddingley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Balliang tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Maddingley stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Balliang generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Maddingley leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maddingley, while Balliang remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.