Overall score
Hopetoun Park
46.5/100
Maddingley
38.9/100
Hopetoun Park for value and schools; Maddingley for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hopetoun Park
46.5/100
Maddingley
38.9/100
Crime rate
Hopetoun Park
33.8 / 1k
Maddingley
76.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hopetoun Park
7
Maddingley
61
Population
Hopetoun Park
914
Maddingley
5,491
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hopetoun Park | Maddingley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.5/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.9/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.8 / 1k | 76.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | — | 24 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 61 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 53 |
| Green cover | 2.3% | 7.0% |
| Population | 914 | 5,491 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Hopetoun Park reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Maddingley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Hopetoun Park sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Maddingley is in a middle-ring position.
Hopetoun Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, while Maddingley stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community. Hopetoun Park generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Maddingley leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
Choose Hopetoun Park if you are weighing retirees, families, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Maddingley for investors and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.