Hopetoun Park vs Maddingley, VIC Suburb Comparison

Hopetoun Park for value and schools; Maddingley for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hopetoun ParkMaddingley

Overall score

Hopetoun Park

46.5/100

Maddingley

38.9/100

Crime rate

Hopetoun Park

33.8 / 1k

Maddingley

76.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hopetoun Park

7

Maddingley

61

Population

Hopetoun Park

914

Maddingley

5,491

Metric leadHopetoun Park 4Maddingley 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHopetoun ParkMaddingley
Overall score46.5/10038.9/100
Housing (desirability)47.9/10057.0/100
Crime rate33.8 / 1k76.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops—24
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities761
Planning activity1253
Green cover2.3%7.0%
Population9145,491
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Hopetoun Park reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Maddingley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Hopetoun Park sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Maddingley is in a middle-ring position.

Hopetoun Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, while Maddingley stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community. Hopetoun Park generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Maddingley leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.

Choose Hopetoun Park if you are weighing retirees, families, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Maddingley for investors and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons