Overall score
Long Forest
44.0/100
Merrimu
35.0/100
Long Forest for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Long Forest
44.0/100
Merrimu
35.0/100
Crime rate
Long Forest
34.3 / 1k
Merrimu
66.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Long Forest
3
Merrimu
0
Population
Long Forest
343
Merrimu
397
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Long Forest | Merrimu |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.0/100 | 35.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.2/100 | 31.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.3 / 1k | 66.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 343 | 397 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Long Forest reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Merrimu is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Long Forest sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Merrimu is more regionally self-contained.
On the data, Long Forest is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities; Merrimu answers with a larger local community.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Long Forest, while Merrimu remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.