Overall score
Long Forest
50.1/100
Merrimu
40.1/100
Long Forest for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Long Forest
50.1/100
Merrimu
40.1/100
Crime rate
Long Forest
29.0 / 1k
Merrimu
45.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Long Forest
2
Merrimu
0
Population
Long Forest
343
Merrimu
397
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Long Forest | Merrimu |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.1/100 | 40.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 54.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.0 / 1k | 45.7 / 1k |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 11 |
| Population | 343 | 397 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Long Forest reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Merrimu is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Long Forest sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Merrimu is more regionally self-contained.
On the data, Long Forest is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Merrimu answers with a larger local community.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Long Forest the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Merrimu.