Overall score
Baldivis
40.6/100
Hillman
31.8/100
Baldivis vs Hillman, WA Suburb Comparison
Baldivis for retirees and value; Hillman for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BaldivisHillman
Crime rate
Baldivis
61.4 / 1k
Hillman
61.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Baldivis
163
Hillman
20
Population
Baldivis
37,697
Hillman
1,807
Metric leadBaldivis 6Hillman 23 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Baldivis | Hillman |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.6/100 | 31.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.2/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.4 / 1k | 61.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 160 | 15 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 22.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 163 | 20 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Population | 37,697 | 1,807 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Baldivis reads as a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks; Hillman is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Baldivis sits among greener hillside streets, while Hillman keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Baldivis tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Hillman stands out for schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Baldivis, while Hillman remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.