Bamawm Extension vs Lockington, VIC suburb comparison

Bamawm Extension for investment and value; Lockington for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bamawm ExtensionLockington

Overall score

Bamawm Extension

41.3/100

Lockington

38.9/100

Crime rate

Bamawm Extension

7.1 / 1k

Lockington

21.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bamawm Extension

0

Lockington

0

Population

Bamawm Extension

282

Lockington

850

Metric leadBamawm Extension 4Lockington 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBamawm ExtensionLockington
Overall score41.3/10038.9/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10056.6/100
Crime rate7.1 / 1k21.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Planning activity65
Population282850
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Bamawm Extension reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Lockington is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Bamawm Extension is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Lockington answers with parks and reserves and walkability. Bamawm Extension generally means more mid-market housing value, while Lockington leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and investors may find Bamawm Extension the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lockington.

Related comparisons