Overall score
Bamawm Extension
41.3/100
Wharparilla
26.4/100
Bamawm Extension vs Wharparilla, VIC suburb comparison
Bamawm Extension for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bamawm ExtensionWharparilla
Crime rate
Bamawm Extension
7.1 / 1k
Wharparilla
41.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bamawm Extension
0
Wharparilla
0
Population
Bamawm Extension
282
Wharparilla
483
Metric leadBamawm Extension 4Wharparilla 22 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesBamawm Extension
- Best for investmentBamawm Extension
- Best for best valueBamawm Extension
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bamawm Extension | Wharparilla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.3/100 | 26.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 16.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.1 / 1k | 41.8 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 28 |
| Population | 282 | 483 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bamawm Extension is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Wharparilla is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Bamawm Extension pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Wharparilla is the better pick for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bamawm Extension, while Wharparilla remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.