Overall score
Bamawm Extension
42.2/100
Wharparilla
33.9/100
Bamawm Extension for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bamawm Extension
42.2/100
Wharparilla
33.9/100
Crime rate
Bamawm Extension
7.1 / 1k
Wharparilla
35.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bamawm Extension
1
Wharparilla
1
Population
Bamawm Extension
282
Wharparilla
483
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bamawm Extension | Wharparilla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.2/100 | 33.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.1/100 | 32.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.1 / 1k | 35.5 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 18.6/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 28 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 282 | 483 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Bamawm Extension is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Wharparilla is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Bamawm Extension pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Wharparilla is the better pick for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Bamawm Extension generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wharparilla leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bamawm Extension, while Wharparilla remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.