Bangor vs Sutherland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bangor for retirees and families; Sutherland for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BangorSutherland

Overall score

Bangor

61.9/100

Sutherland

59.4/100

Crime rate

Bangor

20.8 / 1k

Sutherland

70.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bangor

49

Sutherland

341

Population

Bangor

5,536

Sutherland

11,570

Metric leadBangor 5Sutherland 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBangorSutherland
Overall score61.9/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)47.8/10059.8/100
Crime rate20.8 / 1k70.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools712
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves212
Public transport stops5265
Walkability32.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities49341
Planning activity817
Green cover37.1%20.2%
Population5,53611,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Bangor reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Sutherland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Bangor pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Sutherland is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bangor, while Sutherland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons