Miranda vs Sutherland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Sutherland for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MirandaSutherland

Overall score

Miranda

54.8/100

Sutherland

59.4/100

Crime rate

Miranda

102.1 / 1k

Sutherland

70.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Miranda

474

Sutherland

341

Population

Miranda

17,942

Sutherland

11,570

Metric leadMiranda 5Sutherland 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMirandaSutherland
Overall score54.8/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)54.8/10059.8/100
Crime rate102.1 / 1k70.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1512
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1112
Public transport stops14665
Walkability100.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities474341
Planning activity4917
Green cover7.9%20.2%
Population17,94211,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Miranda is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Sutherland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Miranda tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Sutherland stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and a calmer planning outlook.

Miranda suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Sutherland is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons