Como vs Sutherland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Como for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ComoSutherland

Overall score

Como

66.3/100

Sutherland

59.4/100

Crime rate

Como

31.5 / 1k

Sutherland

70.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Como

208

Sutherland

341

Population

Como

4,053

Sutherland

11,570

Metric leadComo 3Sutherland 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for familiesComo
  • Best for investmentComo
  • Best for best valueComo
  • Best for best schoolsComo

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryComoSutherland
Overall score66.3/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)47.1/10059.8/100
Crime rate31.5 / 1k70.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools912
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves412
Public transport stops3765
Walkability59.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities208341
Planning activity1817
Green cover13.3%20.2%
Population4,05311,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Como is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Sutherland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Como is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Sutherland answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Como, while Sutherland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons